U5.12 Exploring Behaviors of Implicit Relations
Master AP Calculus BC 5.12: use implicit differentiation to find horizontal and vertical tangents and analyze concavity of implicitly defined curves.
What you'll do in this lesson
A voice-first session with the Crimsora tutor on U5.12 Exploring Behaviors of Implicit Relations, then targeted practice and FRQs — with the tutor adapting to where you get stuck.
What this lesson covers
Not every curve can be solved for in terms of . Circles, ellipses, and tangled relations like define implicitly, yet they still have tangent lines and bends you can analyze. In this lesson you will take the same first- and second-derivative tools you used for explicit functions and apply them to implicit relations.
The payoff: you can locate where a curve has a horizontal tangent (a possible high or low point), where it turns vertical (where blows up), and where it is concave up or down. These are classic AP free-response and multiple-choice targets, so we will focus on the algebra that trips students up and the reasoning graders reward.
The payoff: you can locate where a curve has a horizontal tangent (a possible high or low point), where it turns vertical (where blows up), and where it is concave up or down. These are classic AP free-response and multiple-choice targets, so we will focus on the algebra that trips students up and the reasoning graders reward.
Setting Up the Implicit Derivative
An implicit relation ties and together in one equation, such as . To differentiate, apply to every term, treating as a function of so that each -derivative carries a factor of (the chain rule). Products of and require the product rule.
For :Collect the terms on one side and factor:Notice the result usually depends on both and . That is the key feature of implicit differentiation and the source of most of the analysis in this topic. A very common error is forgetting the factor on -terms or mishandling the product rule on the term. Always write explicitly rather than in your head, and factor cleanly so you can read off a numerator and a denominator — those two pieces drive the entire tangent analysis that follows.
For :Collect the terms on one side and factor:Notice the result usually depends on both and . That is the key feature of implicit differentiation and the source of most of the analysis in this topic. A very common error is forgetting the factor on -terms or mishandling the product rule on the term. Always write explicitly rather than in your head, and factor cleanly so you can read off a numerator and a denominator — those two pieces drive the entire tangent analysis that follows.
Horizontal and Vertical Tangents
Once is written as a fraction , the tangent behavior comes straight from the numerator and denominator.
Critically, setting or alone is not enough. Those equations describe conditions on and , but the point must also lie on the original curve. So you solve a system: the numerator (or denominator) equation together with the original relation.
For , horizontal tangents need , i.e. , substituted back into . Vertical tangents need combined with the same relation. The AP exam frequently asks you to justify that a point gives a horizontal tangent by verifying both that the numerator is zero and the denominator is nonzero there. Do not skip that nonzero check — it is a common place points are lost.
| Feature | Condition | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Horizontal tangent | and | slope is |
| Vertical tangent | and | slope undefined |
| Indeterminate point | and | needs further analysis (cusp, node, or crossing) |
For , horizontal tangents need , i.e. , substituted back into . Vertical tangents need combined with the same relation. The AP exam frequently asks you to justify that a point gives a horizontal tangent by verifying both that the numerator is zero and the denominator is nonzero there. Do not skip that nonzero check — it is a common place points are lost.
The Second Derivative and Concavity
To find , differentiate again with respect to , using the quotient rule and remembering that any remaining differentiates to . This produces an expression containing , which you then replace using your first-derivative formula. The result is written purely in terms of and .
For example, from on the circle :Concavity follows the usual rule: the curve is concave up where and concave down where it is negative. On the upper half of the circle () the expression is negative, so the curve is concave down — exactly what a circle looks like on top. A frequent misconception is trying to determine concavity from the sign of ; concavity comes only from the second derivative. Always substitute the first-derivative formula before evaluating, or you will leave a stray in your answer.
For example, from on the circle :Concavity follows the usual rule: the curve is concave up where and concave down where it is negative. On the upper half of the circle () the expression is negative, so the curve is concave down — exactly what a circle looks like on top. A frequent misconception is trying to determine concavity from the sign of ; concavity comes only from the second derivative. Always substitute the first-derivative formula before evaluating, or you will leave a stray in your answer.
How the Exam Tests This
On multiple-choice questions you are often given a point and asked for the slope, the equation of the tangent line, or the value of at that point. These reward clean algebra and correct chain-rule bookkeeping. On free-response, you typically differentiate implicitly, then are asked to (a) find all points with a horizontal tangent, (b) show a tangent is vertical, or (c) determine concavity or classify a point.
Graders look for specific evidence. For a horizontal tangent, show the numerator equals zero and confirm the denominator does not. For concavity at a point, produce a numerical value of and state its sign with a conclusion ("since , the curve is concave down there").
Time-savers: keep as a single fraction, and when a problem gives you a specific point, plug in numbers early once you have the first derivative — you rarely need the fully simplified symbolic second derivative. Watch units of justification: a bare answer without the sign statement or the nonzero-denominator check often costs a point even when the arithmetic is perfect.
Graders look for specific evidence. For a horizontal tangent, show the numerator equals zero and confirm the denominator does not. For concavity at a point, produce a numerical value of and state its sign with a conclusion ("since , the curve is concave down there").
Time-savers: keep as a single fraction, and when a problem gives you a specific point, plug in numbers early once you have the first derivative — you rarely need the fully simplified symbolic second derivative. Watch units of justification: a bare answer without the sign statement or the nonzero-denominator check often costs a point even when the arithmetic is perfect.
Key terms
- Implicit relation.
- An equation relating and that is not solved for , such as , yet still defines one or more curves.
- Implicit differentiation.
- Differentiating both sides of a relation with respect to , treating as a function of so every -term gains a factor of .
- Horizontal tangent.
- A point where , which for a fraction means the numerator is zero while the denominator is nonzero.
- Vertical tangent.
- A point where is undefined because the denominator is zero while the numerator is nonzero; the tangent line is vertical.
- Second derivative.
- , found by differentiating again and substituting the first-derivative expression to remove any remaining .
- Concavity.
- The direction a curve bends: concave up where and concave down where .
Worked example
Consider the curve . Find all points where the curve has a horizontal tangent, and determine whether the curve is concave up or down at the point .
Differentiate implicitly. Using the product rule on :Group the terms:Horizontal tangents require the numerator , so , with denominator . Substitute into the original curve:This gives the points and . Check the denominator at : , and at : . Both are genuine horizontal tangents.
Now concavity at . First confirm there. Differentiate using the quotient rule:At , and , so the second term vanishes:Since , the curve is concave down at , consistent with this point being a local maximum on that branch.
Now concavity at . First confirm there. Differentiate using the quotient rule:At , and , so the second term vanishes:Since , the curve is concave down at , consistent with this point being a local maximum on that branch.
Practice questions
For the curve , at which point does the curve have a vertical tangent line?
Answer:
Implicit differentiation gives , so . A vertical tangent occurs where the denominator is zero and the numerator is nonzero: with . On the circle, gives . Among the choices, satisfies this. The points and give (horizontal tangents), and at the slope is .
The curve defined by passes through the point . Find at this point, and determine whether the curve is concave up or concave down there. Justify your answer.
Answer: at , and the curve is concave up there.
Differentiate: , so . At : , a horizontal tangent. Differentiate again with the quotient rule: . At the second term vanishes because , leaving , meaning concave up. Because the first derivative is zero and the second derivative is positive, is a local minimum on that branch and the curve is concave up there.
For the relation , find all -values (with corresponding points) where the curve has a horizontal tangent line.
Answer: There are no points with a horizontal tangent.
Differentiating: , so , giving . A horizontal tangent needs the numerator , i.e. . But substituting into gives , which is impossible. Since no point on the curve has , there are no horizontal tangents. This illustrates why you must always check the numerator condition against the original equation.
FAQ
- How do I know whether a tangent is horizontal or vertical?
- Write as a single fraction . A horizontal tangent occurs where the numerator but the denominator (slope zero). A vertical tangent occurs where but (slope undefined). Always verify the point actually lies on the original curve.
- Why does my second derivative still have dy/dx in it?
- That is expected after the first round of differentiation. You must substitute your first-derivative expression back into the result so that is written only in terms of and . If a problem gives a specific point, you can plug in the numeric value of instead of simplifying symbolically.
- What happens when both the numerator and denominator of dy/dx are zero at a point?
- That point is indeterminate — the simple horizontal/vertical rule does not apply. The curve may have a cusp, a self-intersection, or cross itself. On the AP exam these cases are rare; if you meet one, additional analysis (such as examining nearby behavior or the original equation) is needed, and the problem will usually guide you.
- Do I really need to check that the denominator is nonzero for a horizontal tangent?
- Yes. Setting the numerator to zero only shows the slope could be zero. If the denominator is also zero there, the slope is not actually zero — it is indeterminate. AP graders often require this nonzero-denominator statement as part of a complete justification, so include it.
Learn this with a teacher, not a page
The Crimsora tutor teaches U5.12 Exploring Behaviors of Implicit Relations live — explaining on a whiteboard, asking you questions, and adapting to where you get stuck.